Are you a thread STARTER or RESPONDER...

Are you the type of person who likes to START threads to get conversations going or are you the type that let's others choose topics that you respond to?

I try to post things that I find interesting but I don't wanna post FLUFF to have something to post...

I'd rather XMT have 3 good topics a day rather than 15 that are just FILLER...

Where do you fit in?

I've always responded more than started a new topic. Back in the days when I bought several watches a month it was different, now I don't always post a watch that I buy or build.

I realy like to start threads but only if it is something we havent seen or talked about, so i end up responding to more threads than starting. like you said Alan i would rather see a few new threads vs 10-15 threads that are started just to start one.

I do both, but more responding than starting.

I genuinely like doing both as well, but find myself being more of a responder I guess.
Often find myself trying to come up with interesting topics, or find new watch models,
and companies to talk about. However, seeing what topics other members come up
with is REALLY fun imho !!!

I certainly respond more than start but occasionally I do get one going.

I'm a responder, there is a lot to learn about horology and I know very little. I like the saying "better to keep your mouth shut and let people think that you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt".

I think 60/40 responder/starter

Persuant to this post, I respond more than start. But there is always the daily Watch-U-Wearing!

I usually do neither since I don't post much anymore.

Eitherway, I rarely find I have a unique take on something and my wit is in the crapper. Therefore I vote that I'm a big bag of ...

i try to be a starter,but if you would average it out i guess i'm a responder